The Joint External Evaluation (JEE) is a voluntary component of the International Health Regulations Monitoring and Evaluation Framework (IHRMEF). The JEE was introduced in 2016 to measure the availability of a country’s capacity to prevent, detect, and rapidly respond to public health emergencies. This third edition of the JEE includes improvements to the overall tool and new indicators based on the lessons learnt from the COVID19 pandemic. The third version of the JEE tool comprises of 19 technical areas and 56 indicators.

The United Republic of Tanzania is to be commended for persistently volunteering to be among the first countries to undertake the JEE assessment – its first assessment took place in February 2016. This demonstrates strong commitment, dedication, leadership, confidence and foresight of both the United Republic of Tanzania Government and the national experts involved. The latest evaluation was a joint exercise between a multisectoral team of experts from the country and an external team of experts, who participated in a weeklong evaluation from 14 to 18 August 2023 in Dar es Salaam, the United Republic of Tanzania. The Joint external evaluation tool: International Health Regulations (2005), third edition was specifically utilized to determine the country’s current capacity, including gaps and needs; to measure progress on work implemented across the International Health Regulations (2005), third edition (IHR) core capacities; and to highlight the strengths, challenges, gaps and needs for current and prospective support, as well as to inform country-level planning and priority setting. All of the technical areas have specific indicators that were examined and rated according to a spectrum of capacity, from level 1, indicating ‘no capacity’, to level 5, indicating ‘sustainable capacity.

Public health emergencies continually reinforce the need for an integrated approach to health systems strengthening, underpinned by a public health approach, helping to build health systems resilience. As part of a collaboration between the USAID Office of the Health Systems and the WHO Integrated Health Services Department, a strategic meeting was convened on 14 April 2021. This had wide-ranging representation which included WHO Deputy Director-General, Executive leadership from USAID, IANPHI and WFPHA. The overarching aim was to examine this topic together and identify actionable steps to build an integrated approach to health system strengthening that brings together health security, humanitarian, disease-specific and life-course-specific programmes. The specific objectives of the meeting were to: facilitate strategic discussions on prevailing practices in health systems resilience for health protection and high-quality health services, to determine actionable next steps for global guidance; inform policy options for WHO, USAID and partners to maximize joint country support for health systems resilience; and identify immediate priorities for next steps following the meeting. To inform and support the proceedings of this meeting, complementary desk reviews were conducted to synthesise evidence, and inform the discussions and way forward. Together, this package consists of (i) a technical meeting report and (ii) two complementary desk reviews. The package was co-developed with and has received concurrence from the USAID Office of the Health Systems.

Following the 2003 SARS outbreak, more than 100 countries have gone through a Joint External Evaluation (JEE), one of the monitoring and evaluation practices developed alongside IHR, in the last five years. Undertaking these evaluations has the additional benefit of initiating multisectoral dialogue and collaborative practices required to engage in One Health whole-of-government strategies for preparing for and preventing infectious disease outbreaks and zoonoses.

During the JEE mission in early December 2023, capacities in 19 technical areas for Armenia were evaluated through a peer-to-peer, consultative process that brought a multi-sectoral group of national subject matter experts together with the multi-national, multi-disciplinary JEE team for a week of discussion, collaboration, and field visits. This process led to consensus on scores and priority actions across the 19 technical areas. Armenia’s commitment to strengthening its IHR core capacities is evident from the decision to undertake a second JEE. Since the first JEE was conducted in August 2016, Armenia has worked hard to develop and improve its public health capabilities and capacities. Like all countries, Armenia was significantly impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic. Although the national and local pandemic responses revealed areas that can be further strengthened, it is noteworthy that a strong and resilient health sector was able to maintain essential health services, as exemplified by the continuation of commendably high vaccination rates by the national immunization programme. The recent humanitarian crisis arising from the military conflict in Nagorno-Karabakh resulted in forced displacement of more than 100 thousand refugees with a diversity of health issues serve as a reminder for the need to maintain vigilance and be fully prepared to respond to complex emergencies that require strong collaboration between public health, security and other concerned sectors. Through a careful review of the findings of both the field visits and the plenary and bilateral technical discussions, the external team identified several cross-cutting themes and challenges that impact all 19 technical areas. In view of these findings, four recommendations are proposed.

Since its independence was restored in 1991, Estonia has restructured its public health and health security landscape, and joined the European Union (EU) in 2004. Since this, and despite its relatively small geographical size and population, the country's economic growth and the importance of Estonia and Estonians in the development of the information and communication technology (ICT) sector has been much remarked upon. This has brought about interest in the development and uptake of ICT solutions within the health sector, and considerable upgrades to health provision and infrastructure. Due to Estonia's geographical position, health security will always be of significant interest to the country and much has been achieved in the last 20 years. With this combination of factors, the WHO Joint External Evaluation (JEE) in Estonia was deemed of interest not only to Estonia but also as an example of how a small, now highly developed country can work to improve its health security. A further point of interest is that Estonia has, in general, a widely spaced population with low density; another challenge to providing services which needs to be overcome. During the JEE mission to Estonia, capacities in 19 technical areas were evaluated through a peer-to-peer collaborative process that brought subject matter experts together with members of the external assessment team. The team was composed of representatives from 10 Member States, international organizations or academic institutions, engaged in a week-long series of technical discussions and on-site visits. The primary objective of the assessment was to compile a comprehensive array of evidence, encapsulating evaluations, reviews and other relevant insights. The aim was to equip Estonian authorities with actionable information for improving implementation of the International Health Regulations (IHR) 2005, encompassing cost estimates, high-level commitment and accountability. While the assessment itself can facilitate knowledge exchange and networking, it does not improve health security capacities per se. Therefore, identified priority recommendations should be captured in a National Action Plan for Health Security (NAPHS), which in turn drives translation of priorities into concrete technical activities. The external team acknowledges that many recommendations deal with establishing committees, action plans and strategies, all of which may be crucial steps for capacity development, but nevertheless need to be streamlined given constraints on human resource capacity.

The purpose of the external evaluation is to measure country-specific status and progress in developing the capacity to prevent, detect and rapidly respond to public health threats, be they naturally occurring, deliberate or accidental. Progress in achieving the target requires a sustainable and flexible process that enables regular evaluations.

National food control system plays a pivotal role in protecting the health of consumers and ensuring fair practices in food trade. When we are able to assess performance of the system in a comprehensive way, it can identify priority areas of improvement and plan sequential and coordinated activities to reach expected outcomes. To demonstrate good performance of the system gives an opportunity to Member states for new markets, to improve trading relationships and to build stakeholder confidence domestically as well. FAO and WHO jointly developed a comprehensive tool to assist Member states in assessing the effectiveness of national food control system. The FAO/WHO Food Control System Assessment Tool comprises 162 assessment criteria under 25 system competencies over 4 Dimensions. This introductory booklet is designed to facilitate application of the assessment tool, and competent authorities are able to have an overview by this booklet before they initiate the assessment. This booklet includes several interactive buttons and links to better browse the document. Interactive tools (such as texts underlined in orange) includes also “pop-up” additional notes which can be opened clicking on the symbol +.