In 1972, Congress responded to the growing national water pollution problem by passing the Clean Water Act (CWA) in an effort to protect and maintain the quality of the nation's waters. Since that time, courts, regulatory agencies, and Congress itself have struggled to interpret, apply, and define the CWA coherently and uniformly, particularly regarding its regulation of wetlands. Within the judiciary, federal courts at all levels have established varying limits on the reach of the CWA's jurisdiction over wetlands. Similar inconsistencies surfaced in the regulatory agencies responsible for implementing the CWA. In the 1970s, for example, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) promulgated conflicting regulatory interpretations of the extent of the Corps's jurisdiction over wetlands. And when Congress amended the CWA in 1977, it not only failed to resolve existing ambiguities regarding the reach of the Corps's jurisdiction, it intensified the interpretive difficulties by defining “navigable waters” broadly as the “waters of the United States,” without determining the extent to which either term applied to the regulation of wetlands. The pervasive inconsistency exhibited in all branches of the government regarding the CWA's application to wetlands has been exacerbated by the Supreme Court's distinction between wetlands that are not adjacent to navigable waters and those that are adjacent to navigable waters. Other recent Supreme Court decisions interpreting Congress's powers under the Commerce Clause have added to the confusion. These decisions have resulted in a split among the lower courts as to the reach of Congress's commerce powers to regulate non-adjacent wetlands. This Article proposes that the inconsistencies are best overcome by: (1) a scientifically based interpretive framework that will increase the predictability and uniformity of court decisions applying the CWA to wetlands regulations, and (2) an explicit expansion of the meaning of “channels of commerce” to include activities that substantially affect channels of commerce, irrespective of whether such activities substantially affect interstate commerce. Part II discusses the legislative and judicial histories of the CWA. Part III reviews Supreme Court decisions interpreting Congress's powers to regulate commerce, and federal judicial decisions interpreting the CWA within the context of contemporary Commerce Clause doctrine. Part IV discusses the utility of congressional power to protect wetlands as a class under the CWA in light of the nexus between pollution of navigable waters and wetlands as a potential source point for pollution. Part V concludes that Congress's commerce powers extend to regulating intrastate, isolated, non-navigable wetlands, and that Congress should grant explicit jurisdiction over such wetlands to the Corps. Some commentators have argued that regulating wetlands is a channel-of-commerce power, as opposed to a substantial effects power, and others have argued that courts should consider groundwater flow between wetlands and navigable surface waters as a sufficient nexus to invoke Congress's power. This Article seeks to combine and strengthen those arguments by adding scientific underpinnings to support them both, and by considering the implications of the Supreme Court's recent decision in Gonzales v. Raich, which interprets the Commerce Clause as applied to a comprehensive scheme of legislation.

An Introduction to Constitutional Law teaches the narrative of constitutional law as it has developed historically and provides the essential background to understand how this foundational body of law has come to be what it is today. This multimedia experience combines a book and video series to engage students more directly in the study of constitutional law. All students—even those unfamiliar with American history—will garner a firm understanding of how constitutional law has evolved. An eleven-hour online video library brings the Supreme Court’s most important decisions to life. Videos are enriched by photographs, maps, and audio from the Supreme Court. The book and videos are accessible for all levels: law school, college, high school, home school, and independent study. Students can read and watch these materials before class to prepare for lectures or study after class to fill in any gaps in their notes. And, come exam time, students can binge-watch the entire canon of constitutional law in about twelve hours.

Preemption is a doctrine of American constitutional law, under which states and local governments are deprived of their power to act in a given area, whether or not the state or local law, rule or action is in direct conflict with federal law. This book covers not only the basics of preemption but also focuses on such topics as federal mechanisms for agency preemption, implied forms of preemption, and defensive use of federal preemption in civil litigation.

The purchase of this ebook edition does not entitle you to receive access to the Connected eBook with Study Center on CasebookConnect. You will need to purchase a new print book to get access to the full experience, including: lifetime access to the online ebook with highlight, annotation, and search capabilities; practice questions from your favorite study aids; an outline tool and other helpful resources. American Constitutional Law: Powers and Liberties provides a broad survey of the field without overwhelming students. The basics of constitutional theory are presented without getting mired in highly theoretical discussions, and cases are tightly edited to focus on the most important aspects, with additional cases on select topics condensed into narrative summaries. This book focuses on cases and expository text rather than extensive academic commentary, and the introductory text provides direction to students as they read and analyze the materials that follow. Additionally, challenging hypotheticals are provided throughout the text for use as student self-assessments or to launch stimulating class discussions. This highly teachable book can be used for a one- or two-semester course and is easily adaptable to suit each professor’s preferences. ?New to the 7th Edition: Updated through the Supreme Court’s 2021–2022 Term Summarizes or omits older or outdated cases to reduce length New questions and problems for added cases to promote self-assessment Benefits for instructors and students: Easily adaptable to a one- or two-semester course “Just-right” editing of major cases, with less important cases summarized in notes or narrative summary Even-handed presentation of cases so adopters don’t have to “teach against” the text Narrative introductions provide students with context and organizational structure Ideologically neutral tone appeals to professors occupying various points on an ideological spectrum Supplemented annually

Many of these questions--including the powers of the federal government, the individual right to bear arms, and the parameters of corporate political speech--had long been considered settled. But the Federalist Society was able to upend the existing conventional wisdom, promoting constitutional theories that had previously been dismissed as ludicrously radical. Hollis-Brusky argues that the Federalist Society offers several of the crucial ingredients needed to accomplish this constitutional revolution. It serves as a credentialing institution for conservative lawyers and judges, legitimizes novel interpretations of the constitution through a conservative framework, and provides a judicial audience of like-minded peers, which prevents the well-documented phenomenon of conservative judges turning moderate after years on the bench. Through these functions, it is able to exercise enormous influence on important cases at every level.

The 2023 Supplement contains excerpts from cases decided since the publication of the Fourth Edition of the authors’ casebooks. New to the 2023 Edition: Haaland v. Brackeen National Pork Producers Council v. Ross Moore v. Harper Students for Fair Admissions v. President and Fellows of Harvard College 303 Creative LLC v. Elenis

The 2024 Supplement contains excerpts from cases decided since the publication of the Fourth Edition of the authors’ casebooks. New to the 2024 Edition: 1. Trump v. United States 2. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau v. Community Financial Services Association of America 3. United States v. Rahimi

What did the Constitution mean at the time it was adopted? How should we interpret today the words used by the Founding Fathers? In ORIGINALISM: A QUARTER-CENTURY OF DEBATE, these questions are explained and dissected by the very people who continue to shape the legal structure of our country.This is a lively and fascinating discussion of an issue that has occupied the greatest legal minds in America, and one that continues to elicit strong reactions from both those who support and those who oppose the rule of law. Steven G. Calabresi, co-founder of the Federalist Society and professor of law at Northwestern University School of Law, has compiled an impressive collection of speeches, panel discussions, and debates from some of the greatest and most prominent legal experts of the last twenty-five years.

This book analyzes the theoretical nuances and practical implications of how judges use precedent.

Constitutions and the Commons looks at a critical but little examined issue of the degree to which the federal constitution of a nation contributes toward or limits the ability of the national government to manage its domestic natural resources. Furthermore it considers how far the constitution facilitates the binding of constituent states, provinces or subnational units to honor the conditions of international environmental treaties. While the main focus is on the US, there is also detailed coverage of other nations such as Australia, Brazil, India, and Russia. After introducing the role of constitutions in establishing the legal framework for environmental management in federal systems, the author presents a continuum of constitutionally driven natural resource management scenarios, from local to national, and then to global governance. These sections describe how subnational governance in federal systems may take on the characteristics of a commons – with all the attendant tragedies – in the absence of sufficient national constitutional authority. In turn, sufficient national constitutional authority over natural resources also allows these nations to more effectively engage in efforts to manage the global commons, as these nations would be unconstrained by subnational units of government during international negotiations. It is thus shown that national governments in federal systems are at the center of a constitutional 'nested governance commons,' with lower levels of government potentially acting as rational herders on the national commons and national governments potentially acting as rational herders on the global commons. National governments in federal systems are therefore crucial to establishing sustainable management of resources across scales. The book concludes by discussing how federal systems without sufficient national constitutional authority over resources may be strengthened by adopting the approach of federal constitutions that facilitate more robust national level inputs into natural resources management, facilitating national minimum standards as a form of "Fail-safe Federalism" that subnational governments may supplement with discretion to preserve important values of federalism.