This work has been selected by scholars as being culturally important, and is part of the knowledge base of civilization as we know it. This work was reproduced from the original artifact, and remains as true to the original work as possible. Therefore, you will see the original copyright references, library stamps (as most of these works have been housed in our most important libraries around the world), and other notations in the work. This work is in the public domain in the United States of America, and possibly other nations. Within the United States, you may freely copy and distribute this work, as no entity (individual or corporate) has a copyright on the body of the work.As a reproduction of a historical artifact, this work may contain missing or blurred pages, poor pictures, errant marks, etc. Scholars believe, and we concur, that this work is important enough to be preserved, reproduced, and made generally available to the public. We appreciate your support of the preservation process, and thank you for being an important part of keeping this knowledge alive and relevant.

Excerpt from The Kentucky Law Reporter, Vol. 3: July, 1881, to July, 1882 Such improvements as may be suggested, from time to time, will be adapted, and it will be the constant endeavor of the editors to give useful and acceptable information to the bench and bar of the State, and to the profession generally. About the Publisher Forgotten Books publishes hundreds of thousands of rare and classic books. Find more at www.forgottenbooks.com This book is a reproduction of an important historical work. Forgotten Books uses state-of-the-art technology to digitally reconstruct the work, preserving the original format whilst repairing imperfections present in the aged copy. In rare cases, an imperfection in the original, such as a blemish or missing page, may be replicated in our edition. We do, however, repair the vast majority of imperfections successfully; any imperfections that remain are intentionally left to preserve the state of such historical works.

This work has been selected by scholars as being culturally important, and is part of the knowledge base of civilization as we know it. This work was reproduced from the original artifact, and remains as true to the original work as possible. Therefore, you will see the original copyright references, library stamps (as most of these works have been housed in our most important libraries around the world), and other notations in the work.This work is in the public domain in the United States of America, and possibly other nations. Within the United States, you may freely copy and distribute this work, as no entity (individual or corporate) has a copyright on the body of the work.As a reproduction of a historical artifact, this work may contain missing or blurred pages, poor pictures, errant marks, etc. Scholars believe, and we concur, that this work is important enough to be preserved, reproduced, and made generally available to the public. We appreciate your support of the preservation process, and thank you for being an important part of keeping this knowledge alive and relevant.

This work has been selected by scholars as being culturally important, and is part of the knowledge base of civilization as we know it. This work was reproduced from the original artifact, and remains as true to the original work as possible. Therefore, you will see the original copyright references, library stamps (as most of these works have been housed in our most important libraries around the world), and other notations in the work.This work is in the public domain in the United States of America, and possibly other nations. Within the United States, you may freely copy and distribute this work, as no entity (individual or corporate) has a copyright on the body of the work.As a reproduction of a historical artifact, this work may contain missing or blurred pages, poor pictures, errant marks, etc. Scholars believe, and we concur, that this work is important enough to be preserved, reproduced, and made generally available to the public. We appreciate your support of the preservation process, and thank you for being an important part of keeping this knowledge alive and relevant.

This historic book may have numerous typos and missing text. Purchasers can usually download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. Not indexed. Not illustrated. 1886 edition. Excerpt: ...to the preparation of the bill of exceptions with a view of presenting the exceptions in a proper form to this court, and when coming here with the signature of the judge and nothing to show an omission from the record of a part of the evidence or a part of the instructions (when all should be embodied in the bill), the bill will be regarded as in compliance with the provisions of the Code. Under the former practice cases can be found where bills of exception have been excluded on extremely technical grounds by adhering to the very letter of the Code, when the court, too, upon an inspection of the record, must have been satisfied that the bill was complete. Those decisions proceeded upon the idea that it must affirm-atively appear that the bill contained all the evidence or all the instructions, when the signature of the trial court, whe there record failed to show any omission of the evidence or instructions, was all that should have been required. The bill of exceptions in this case appearing to be complete there is no reason for disregarding it. In this case it appears from the bill that when giving instruction N0. 2 by the court on its own motion I/ze dz'fcentswa'an/s excepted, and when refusing to give instruction No. 6 I/12 defendant: excepted. Afiidavits of counsel appear in the record showing that these exceptions were not taken as they appear in the bill, and were not reserved until after the trial. These affidavits will not be considered as destroying the verity of the record when certified by the court below to be proper. The truth of what the judge states or certifies as the bill of evidence may be controverted by the afifidavit of by-standers in the form of a bill of evidence, but when he certifies as to his own rulings an

Excerpt from The Kentucky Law Reporter, Vol. 25: Part 1; July 1, 1903, to January 15, 1904, Inclusive Pane. Locke v. Commonwealth 76 Movaw v. Shelby. &o Logsdon v. Haney. &c.. 945 Meredith 8: Duvall 17. Common Logsdon v. Western Brick Co. 141 wealth. Lou1sville Atlanta By. 00. 'v. Messer v. Commonwealth. About the Publisher Forgotten Books publishes hundreds of thousands of rare and classic books. Find more at www.forgottenbooks.com This book is a reproduction of an important historical work. Forgotten Books uses state-of-the-art technology to digitally reconstruct the work, preserving the original format whilst repairing imperfections present in the aged copy. In rare cases, an imperfection in the original, such as a blemish or missing page, may be replicated in our edition. We do, however, repair the vast majority of imperfections successfully; any imperfections that remain are intentionally left to preserve the state of such historical works.

This work has been selected by scholars as being culturally important, and is part of the knowledge base of civilization as we know it. This work was reproduced from the original artifact, and remains as true to the original work as possible. Therefore, you will see the original copyright references, library stamps (as most of these works have been housed in our most important libraries around the world), and other notations in the work.This work is in the public domain in the United States of America, and possibly other nations. Within the United States, you may freely copy and distribute this work, as no entity (individual or corporate) has a copyright on the body of the work.As a reproduction of a historical artifact, this work may contain missing or blurred pages, poor pictures, errant marks, etc. Scholars believe, and we concur, that this work is important enough to be preserved, reproduced, and made generally available to the public. We appreciate your support of the preservation process, and thank you for being an important part of keeping this knowledge alive and relevant.

Excerpt from The Kentucky Law Reporter, Vol. 24: Part I, July 1, 1902, to January 1, 1903 On page 596, third subdivision of syllabus, section 4397, Kentucky Statutes, should he 489. Code of Practice. About the Publisher Forgotten Books publishes hundreds of thousands of rare and classic books. Find more at www.forgottenbooks.com This book is a reproduction of an important historical work. Forgotten Books uses state-of-the-art technology to digitally reconstruct the work, preserving the original format whilst repairing imperfections present in the aged copy. In rare cases, an imperfection in the original, such as a blemish or missing page, may be replicated in our edition. We do, however, repair the vast majority of imperfections successfully; any imperfections that remain are intentionally left to preserve the state of such historical works.