This book examines how teaching and learning and teacher and student identities are being reframed in higher education by neoliberal policies and practices. It shares how teachers perform teaching and learning duties in relation to prescribed institutional policies and how teachers insert dissonant pedagogies as a critical practice. The book explores narrative pedagogy as a disruptive presence and a space for critique. It interrogates personal/professional experience of educational systems that present educators juggling complexity and meeting competing demands to make learning meaningful for students. Each contribution will act as a counterpoint and provide a synoptic method for comparison. The book re-constructs meaning from the generic narrative of the public face of education, which homogenizes and diminishes collective understandings of teachers and teaching. This book provides a contemporary account of the social realities experienced within the higher education classroom across the globe.

Drawing on affect theory and research on academic capitalism, this book examines the contemporary crisis of universities. Moving through 11 international and comparative case studies, it explores diverse features of contemporary academic life, from the coloniality of academic capitalism to performance management and the experience of being performance-managed. Affect has emerged as a major analytical lens of social research. However, it is rarely applied to universities and their marketisation. Offering a unique exploration of the contemporary role of affect in academic labour and the organisation of scholarship, this book considers modes of subjectivation, professional and personal relationships and organisational structures and their affective charges. Chapter 9 is available Open Access via OAPEN under CC-BY-NC-ND licence.

This dissertation bridges together the fields of composition studies with literary studies in order to advance a new pedagogical framework for teaching for social justice in the writing about literature classroom. Coined a pedagogy of insurgency, this pedagogical framework intends to transform how undergraduate students envision and engage social justice through literary texts. In the Introduction, I outline the core aspects of pedagogy of insurgency and how it functions as a pedagogical apparatus in the writing about literature classroom. In Chapters 1 and 2, I mobilize pedagogy of insurgency into a critical reading practice and illuminate for readers how Michelle Cliff’s Abeng (1984) and Jamaica Kincaid’s Lucy (1990) intervene into the common assumptions of the average American reader. In these chapters, I introduce the concept of affective counter-narratives, which, as I argue, feature subjugated knowledges and histories. With affective counter-narratives as a lens, I examine how Cliff’s Abeng functions as a critique of the architects of Empire in the liberal past. Similarly, I examine how Kincaid’s Lucy interrogates the rhetoric of happiness and well-being in the neoliberal present. Taken together, I conclude that affective counter-narratives in Abeng and Lucy serve as vehicles for ‘winning hearts and minds’ for social justice and affect readers cognitively and emotionally. While Chapters 1 and 2 mobilize pedagogy of insurgency as a reading practice for limning affective counter-narratives in Cliff’s Abeng and Kincaid’s Lucy, Chapter 3 examines how pedagogy of insurgency impacts my scaffolding procedures in the writing about literature classroom. I close-read the curricula I have developed between academic years 2012 and 2015 in order to illustrate how I implement pedagogy of insurgency as a heuristic for teaching social justice in the writing about literature classroom. I examine sequencing for justice, reading for justice, ‘doing genre’ for justice, and writing for justice as central to my curriculum. In Chapters 4, 5, and 6, I pivot to an empirical investigation into how pedagogy of insurgency affects undergraduate students’ learning outcomes. With Kathy Charmaz (2006) constructivist grounded theory methodology for qualitative research, I offer insight into the extent to which students are transformed by my pedagogy of insurgency as they navigate contexts both within the university classroom and beyond it. My qualitative research bolsters key arguments staked in outlining my pedagogy of insurgency and how I recondition students’ affective relationship to social justice. This research includes examining how students’ prior knowledge and world-views affect learning about social justice in Chapter 4; how students acquire new knowledge of social justice in the classroom in Chapter 5; and how students “recontextualize” (Nowacek 2011) knowledge acquired in my courses in new contexts in Chapter 6. To end my dissertation, I reflect on the implications of my research project and summarize for readers the revisions I have made to my curricula. Additionally, although my research takes place in FYC and sophomore literature courses at the University of Washington, I offer insight for all teacher-scholars committed to teaching for social justice. In outlining aspects of pedagogy of insurgency and its influence on close-reading and teaching practices, I do not intend for this pedagogical apparatus to be dogmatic or prescriptive in nature. Rather, I offer pedagogy of insurgency as simply one way for transforming how we might be responsive to student learning outcomes while also advancing social justice in the neoliberal university. To that end, Chapter 7 presents readers a generalized rubric for “teaching for justice” (Alexander 2005) and offers teacher-scholars outside of English departments and the Humanities suggestions for transforming students’ orientations to advancing social justice.

This volume examines the role of neoliberalism and its impact on education in South Asia. It contends that education is in a state of crisis across the world. This is reflected not only in the way the state has withdrawn to pave way for private capital but also in the manner in which knowledge and ways of understanding the world are being challenged by manipulation and adverse influences. A process of ‘factoryisation’ is underway as disciplining of human minds and redefinition of the purpose of human existence are being geared to fall in line with the needs of private capital. The book brings together incisive contributions from India, Sri Lanka, Pakistan and Nepal to explore newer possibilities to deal with the educational crisis, and looks at a range of critical themes in education: pedagogy, teacher–learner relationship, teacher education, the state of the university, and policy. Rich in content, critical and insightful, this book will be a valuable addition for scholars and researchers of education and education policy, sociology, public policy and South Asian Studies.

Recognizing the dominance of neoliberal forces in education, this volume offers a range of critical essays which analyze the language used to underpin these dynamics. Combining essays from over 20 internationally renowned contributors, this text offers a critical examination of key terms which have become increasingly central to educational discourse. Each essay considers the etymological foundation of each term, the context in which they have evolved, and likewise their changed meaning. In doing so, these essays illustrate the transformative potential of language to express or challenge political, social, and economic ideologies. The text’s musings on the language of education and its implications for the current and future role of education in society make clear its relevance to today’s cultural and political landscape. This exploratory monograph will be of interest to doctoral students, researchers, and scholars with an interest in the philosophy of education, educational policy and politics, as well as the sociology of education and the impacts of neoliberalism.

In one volume, this edited collection provides both a theoretical and praxis-driven engagement with teaching world literature, focusing on various aspects of critical pedagogy. Included are nine praxis-driven essays by instructors who have taught world literature courses at the university level.

Susan L. Groenke and J. Amos Hatch It does not feel safe to be critical in university-based teacher education programs right now, especially if you are junior faculty. In the neoliberal era, critical teacher education research gets less and less funding, and professors can be denied tenure or lose their jobs for speaking out against the status quo. Also, we know that the pedagogies critical teacher educators espouse can get beginning K–12 teachers fired or shuffled around, especially if their students’ test scores are low. This, paired with the resistance many of the future teachers who come through our programs—predominantly White, middle-class, and happy with the current state of affairs—show toward critical pedagogy, makes it seem a whole lot easier, less risky, even smart not to “do” critical pedagogy at all. Why bother? We believe this book shows we have lots of reasons to “bother” with critical pe- gogy in teacher education, as current educational policies and the neoliberal discourses that vie for the identities of our own local contexts increasingly do not have education for the public good in mind. This book shows teacher educators taking risks, seeking out what political theorist James Scott has called the “small openings” for resistance in the contexts that mark teacher education in the early twenty-first century.

ONE OF THE FIRST EDUCATIONAL BOOKS TO CHALLENGE THE BUSH REGIME’s WAR ON TERROR, ITS EDUCATIONAL POLICY, ITS FOREIGN POLICY AND ITS ASSAULT ON THE POOR Written by two leading international exponents of critical pedagogy, this book is a pioneering attempt to create a Marxist humanist and feminist pedagogy for the new century. Critical pedagogy is discussed as an important revolutionary act in bringing about a socialist future. In their conclusion, McLaren and Jaramillo cite an observation made by Arundhati Roy (2004) who insists that "there is no discussion taking place in the world today that is more crucial than the debate about strategies of resistance" (p. 195). McLaren and Jaramillo have clearly contributed to such a conversation with Pedagogy and Praxis in the Age of Empire and their work must be understood as a relevant component in that ongoing dialogue. Moreover, they have been courageous enough to remind us (following Roy) that if we believe democracy should be something more than the "free world’s whore, " something more than "Empire’s euphemism for neoliberal capitalism" (Roy, 2004, p. 54, 56), we can no longer afford to remain indifferent to the horror and savagery unleashed by capitalism’s barbaric machinations. . . . We believe that McLaren and Jaramillo have introduced in PPAE an important and highly productive framework that can help lay the groundwork for expanding human relationships with nature, or, for beginning to ask questions such as who or what should be considered democratic participants. Valerie Scatamburlo-D'Annibale, Ghada Chehade, Richard Kahn, Clayton Pierce and Sheila L. MacrineJCEPS: Vol. 5 No. 2 (November 2007) Perhaps this book is more than just a symbolic warning, since what has transpired during the past decade, perhaps longer, is a reversal in true social justice, often accompanied by blatant denial to the children of the lesser gods of everything that makes up human dignity. Ben Tanosborn http: //www. mwcnews. net/content/view/1696 Critical pedagogy reveals the social relations and institutional structures that mediate how educators approach the concept of curriculum, design, evaluation, and classroom instruction, in order to help students locate their agency so that they can act more coherently as individuals growing up in social conditions not of their own making. As McLaren and Jaramillo see it, a critical pedagogy against capitalism, empire, and imperialism is a pedagogy that works in the interests of working people, empowerment, and democracy. It is a pedagogy for socialism. Andrew Michael Lee, Socialism and Democracy, 2008