This book deals with the Irish development of the equitable doctrine of specific performance, with particular focus on: the nature of specific performance * the contractual context of the remedy * defenses to the action and discretionary reasons for refusal of relief * statue of frauds and subject to contract * part performance * contracts for interests in land * specific performance of contracts with other subject matters * other remedies similar to specific performance * specific performance and third parties * damages and money claims * procedure.

Site-specific performance – acts of theatre and performative events at landscape locations, in village streets, in urban situations. In houses, chapels, barns, disused factories, railway stations; on hillsides, in forest clearings, underwater. At the scale of civil engineering; as intimate as a guided walk. Leading theatre artist and scholar Mike Pearson draws upon thirty years practical experience, proposing original approaches to the creation and study of performance outside the auditorium. In this book he suggests organizing principles, innovative strategies, methods and exercises for making theatre in a variety of contexts and locations, and through examples, case studies and projects develops distinctive theoretical insights into the relationship of site and performance, scenario and scenography. This book encourages practical initiatives in the conception, devising and staging of performances, while also recommending effective models for its critical appreciation.

Rev. ed. of: Contract enforcement / Edward Yorio. c1989.

"The equitable remedy of specific performance continues to be a popular method whereby practitioners seek, on behalf of their clients, to enforce contractual arrangements reached with third parties. The book examines in detail the area of insolvency in the context of specific performance, together with coverage of the Civil Jurisdiction and Judgments Acts 1982 and 1991 which have had a considerable impact on the subject and which were not in force when the first edition was published. "

The law of commercial remedies raises a number of important doctrinal, theoretical and practical controversies which deserve sustained and rigorous examination. This volume explores such controversies and suggests solutions, which is essential to ensure that the law is defensible, clear and just. With contributions from twenty-three leading academic and practitioner experts, this book addresses significant issues in the law which, taken together, range across the entire remedial jurisdiction as it applies to commercial disputes. The book primarily focuses on the resolution of controversies in the English law of commercial remedies, but recent developments elsewhere are also considered, especially in other common law jurisdictions. The result provides remarkably comprehensive coverage of the field which will be of relevance to academics, students, judges and practitioners.

“One of the most important contributions to the field of contract theory—if not the most important—in the past 25 years.” —Stephen A. Smith, McGill University Can we account for contract law on a moral basis that is acceptable from the standpoint of liberal justice? To answer this question, Peter Benson develops a theory of contract that is completely independent of—and arguably superior to—long-dominant views, which take contract law to be justified on the basis of economics or promissory morality. Through a detailed analysis of contract principles and doctrines, Benson brings out the specific normative conception underpinning the whole of contract law. Contract, he argues, is best explained as a transfer of rights, which is complete at the moment of agreement and is governed by a definite conception of justice—justice in transactions. Benson’s analysis provides what John Rawls called a public basis of justification, which is as essential to the liberal legitimacy of contract as to any other form of coercive law. The argument of Justice in Transactions is expressly complementary to Rawls’s, presenting an original justification designed specifically for transactions, as distinguished from the background institutions to which Rawls’s own theory applies. The result is a field-defining work offering a comprehensive theory of contract law. Benson shows that contract law is both justified in its own right and fully congruent with other domains—moral, economic, and political—of liberal society.

Introduction / Daniel Haas, Geerte Hesen, Jan Smits -- Specific performance in Dutch law / Daniel Haas, Chris Jansen -- Specific performance in Belgian law / Patrick Wéry -- Specirif performance, a German perspective / Florian Faust, Wolker Wiese -- Specific implement in Scots law / Laura Masgregor -- Contractual derogation and the discretion to refuse an order for specific performance in South Africa / Gerhard Lubbe -- Specific performance in English consumer sales law / Vanessa Mak -- Certain aspects of the right of repair and replacement under EC directive 1999/44 and its implementation in Poland / Aneta Wiewiórwska-Domagalska -- Specific performance within the heirarchy of remedies in European contract law / Viola Heutger, Janwillem Oosterhuis -- Specific performance : procedural aspects in Dutch law / Anthonie W. Jongbloed -- Specific performance in summary proceedings : state of affairs according to Belgian law / Elke Swaenepoel -- The redress of a terminated contract in Belgian law / Flavie Vermander -- Enforcement of the duty to carry on negotiations :(should it be) a possibility in Europe or not? / Carlos Bollen -- Enforcement of side-letters . F. Willem Grosheide -- Specific performance : a historical perspective / Harry Dondort -- Is the system of contract remedied in the Netherlands efficient from a law and economics perspective? / Geerte Hesen, Robert Hardy -- Do economic analysis and fairness influence the right to performancs in ways contrary to one another? / Gerard de Vries.

A unique comparative analysis of Chinese contract law accessible to lawyers from civil, common, and mixed law jurisdictions.

The arbitral tribunal's responsibilities and tasks often do not end when it has rendered it's award. Tribunals may be called to interpret their awards or correct clerical errors, the award may be sent back to them for amendments; arbitrators may have to comment on their awards or may be called as witnesses; they may be invited to continue even though all pending disputes have been decided; their fees may be challenged or they may have to claim tax reimbursements. These and other issues that arbitrators, parties and institutions have to face once the award has been rendered are examined by leading authorities.