Yu save tu olsem laip bilong man long dispela graun em pait a? Yumi stap long pait, maski yu laikim long stap long pait o nogat. Yu mas long gutpela pait na winim pait. Dispela niupela buk long pait em buk we olgeta ol lida mas ritim.

Singaut long ministri em sinagut long lidim ol manmeri. Yumi lukim gen isi isi na daunim pasin pasin we Dr. Heward-Mills i tok klia long ol ki samting mekim kamap wanpela gutpela Kristen lida stret. Ol tok tru yu lukim long hia bai pawarim planti long pasin bilong lidasip.

Laip em hat long olgeta lain. Planti taim, long daunim wanem samting em mekim yu hevi em wantaim save. Save em hait samting bilong God we i bai helpim yu long kirap long ol hevi bilong yu na kamap long wanpela kain sindaun. God em makim yu long kisim glori. Hait samting bilong God em save bilong God long haitpela wei we i makim yu long glory bilong yu na naispela bilong yu. Kamapim tok hait bilong dispela buk bringim yu win long olgeta de! Dispela buk bai givim yu save long win!

"The perfect dictionary for speakers of Tok Pisin who want to improve their English, and speakers of English who want to learn Tok Pisin."--Book jacket.

The introduction of village courts in Papua New Guinea in 1975 was an ambitious experiment in providing semi-formal legal access to the country’s overwhelmingly rural population. Nearly 50 years later, the enthusiastic adoption of these courts has had a number of ramifications, some of them unanticipated. Arguably, the village courts have developed and are working exactly as they were supposed to do, adapted by local communities to modes and styles consistent with their own dispute management sensibilities. But with little in the way of state oversight or support, most village courts have become, of necessity, nearly autonomous. Village courts have also become the blueprint for other modes of dispute management. They overlap with other sources of authority, so the line between what does and does not constitute a ‘court’ is now indistinct in many parts of the country. Rather than casting this issue as a problem for legal development, the contributors to Grassroots Law in Papua New Guinea ask how, under conditions of state withdrawal, people seek to retain an understanding of law that holds out some promise of either keeping the attention of the state or reproducing the state’s authority.

The journal Synkrētic is an outlet for thought-provoking writing on the philosophy, literature and cultures of the Indo-Pacific. It showcases the diverse traditions of thought, story-telling and expression which are woven into the living tapestry of this culturally, linguistically and politically complex region.