Green River - Hams Fork Final Environmental Impact Statement

Green River - Hams Fork Final Environmental Impact Statement
Author :
Publisher :
Total Pages : 148
Release :
ISBN-10 : UOM:39015018837701
ISBN-13 :
Rating : 4/5 (01 Downloads)

Synopsis Green River - Hams Fork Final Environmental Impact Statement by :

"The Final EIS differs from the Draft because of adjustments in the baseline (or No Action Alternative) and changes to some of the assumptions and data used for the original analysis. These changes are: 1) a decrease of the projected coal production from the study region without new Federal coal leasing; 2) earlier anticipated dates for construction and mining for the proposed coal lease tracts; 3) refinement of the coal reserves and projected production from the coal lease tracts"--Page 9, volume 1.

Green River - Hams Fork Coal Region

Green River - Hams Fork Coal Region
Author :
Publisher :
Total Pages : 322
Release :
ISBN-10 : UOM:39015025281497
ISBN-13 :
Rating : 4/5 (97 Downloads)

Synopsis Green River - Hams Fork Coal Region by : United States. Bureau of Land Management

Final Environmental Impact Statement Supplement for the Federal Coal Management Program: Appendixes, glossary, and references

Final Environmental Impact Statement Supplement for the Federal Coal Management Program: Appendixes, glossary, and references
Author :
Publisher :
Total Pages : 694
Release :
ISBN-10 : UOM:39015022278181
ISBN-13 :
Rating : 4/5 (81 Downloads)

Synopsis Final Environmental Impact Statement Supplement for the Federal Coal Management Program: Appendixes, glossary, and references by : United States. Bureau of Land Management. Division of EIS Services

Green River - Hams Fork Final Environmental Impact Statement

Green River - Hams Fork Final Environmental Impact Statement
Author :
Publisher :
Total Pages :
Release :
ISBN-10 : OCLC:1157140744
ISBN-13 :
Rating : 4/5 (44 Downloads)

Synopsis Green River - Hams Fork Final Environmental Impact Statement by :

"The Final EIS differs from the Draft because of adjustments in the baseline (or No Action Alternative) and changes to some of the assumptions and data used for the original analysis. These changes are: 1) a decrease of the projected coal production from the study region without new Federal coal leasing; 2) earlier anticipated dates for construction and mining for the proposed coal lease tracts; 3) refinement of the coal reserves and projected production from the coal lease tracts"--Page 9, volume 1.