Excerpt from An Enquiry on a Psychological Basis Into the Use of the Progressive Form in Late Modern English The co-existence of two analogous forms in language must necessarily result either in their differentiation or in one of them going to the wall. The progressive form of the verb by the side of the simple form of the verb affords an example of differentiation sometimes clear and distinct, but at times so nice and subtle, that the peculiar shades of meaning conveyed by either form can only be appreciated by comparison as in matters of colouring. The writers who have treated the subject from an historical point of view were sorely hampered by a lack of sufficient discrimination of the two forms in present-day English. History may be a great help to understand the present, the study of existing conditions on the other hand may be conducive toward the elucidation of the past. Apart from this, the student of Modern English will be often tempted to ask why the preference should be given to the extended form of the verb in one case and to the simple tense in another. I have set myself the task to ascertain as clearly as possible the difference between the progressive form and the simple form of the verb in Late Modem English. I have retained the time-honoured name of Progressive Form firstly because of old associations connected with it and secondly because the other names proposed are equally or even more deficient in covering the different functions of the periphrasis. About the Publisher Forgotten Books publishes hundreds of thousands of rare and classic books. Find more at www.forgottenbooks.com This book is a reproduction of an important historical work. Forgotten Books uses state-of-the-art technology to digitally reconstruct the work, preserving the original format whilst repairing imperfections present in the aged copy. In rare cases, an imperfection in the original, such as a blemish or missing page, may be replicated in our edition. We do, however, repair the vast majority of imperfections successfully; any imperfections that remain are intentionally left to preserve the state of such historical works.

Unlike some other reproductions of classic texts (1) We have not used OCR(Optical Character Recognition), as this leads to bad quality books with introduced typos. (2) In books where there are images such as portraits, maps, sketches etc We have endeavoured to keep the quality of these images, so they represent accurately the original artefact. Although occasionally there may be certain imperfections with these old texts, we feel they deserve to be made available for future generations to enjoy.

This work has been selected by scholars as being culturally important, and is part of the knowledge base of civilization as we know it. This work is in the "public domain in the United States of America, and possibly other nations. Within the United States, you may freely copy and distribute this work, as no entity (individual or corporate) has a copyright on the body of the work. Scholars believe, and we concur, that this work is important enough to be preserved, reproduced, and made generally available to the public. We appreciate your support of the preservation process, and thank you for being an important part of keeping this knowledge alive and relevant.

Each number includes the section "Reviews."