The essential tool for gauging your congregation's health and potential for growth. Bill Easum's The Complete Minsitry Audit has long enabled congregations to understand what their particular character is, diagnose their problems and opportunities, and plot strategies to remedy problems and extend their mission into the community. Essentially a condensed version of the instrument Easum himself employs in a consultation, it uses congregational surveys and questionnaires to give church leaders the best tools they can get for plotting their congregation's course. This revised edition makes The Complete Ministry Audit even more user friendly, with updated questionaires, new guides to interpreting the data, and more comprehensive electronic tools on the enclosed CD-ROM. The survey section contains the surveys that you will use to prepare the audit. The surveys are as follows: Worship Survey, Staff Survey, Staff Readiness Survey, Staff Permission Giving Survey, Official Body Survey, Official Body Readiness Survey, and the Official Body Permission Giving Survey.

This study guide will help a church conduct a self-study anbd a complete audit of their ministries. The workshets are printed in the workbook, and are also contained in spreadsheet files on a computer disk provided inside the back cover.

Includes various departmental reports and reports of commissions. Cf. Gregory. Serial publications of foreign governments, 1815-1931.

As governments the world over work to sustain public policy and develop much needed policy initiatives, there is increasing need for better budgetary management and sound evaluation of both past and prospective policies. Budgeting, Auditing, and Evaluation presents in-depth, comparative examinations of budgetary processes in seven major Western governments (United States, United Kingdom, Germany, Canada, Spain, Sweden, and Finland). Contributors focus specifically on the important links between budgeting, auditing, and policy evaluation. The authors identify both commonalities and divergences and make comparative statements of the consequences of these for the policy process.