Ever since my forced departure from India, the true spirit of devotion to the Masters, and the courage to assert it, has steadily dwindled away. I was under the most solemn oath and pledge never to reveal the whole Truth to anyone, except to those who, like Damodar, had been finally selected and called by the Masters. As a Chela of one of Them, all that I was permitted to reveal was that such Great Living Men, proficient in Ancient Wisdom, do exist. Wild and ridiculous fancies soon grew up among Hindus, referring to Them as Mahatmas, belittling Them with weird pictures, and maintaining that such Great Souls were debarred from holding personal intercourse with mortals, particularly in Kali-Yuga. Still, the Masters have already bore good fruit in India by those who believe in Them, through their representative, Madame Blavatsky, who is not only the origin and fountainhead of the modern Theosophical Movement, she also has the means and the necessary knowledge to teach. Aye, my good unforgettable Hindu Brothers, the Name alone of the Holy Masters, which was at one time invoked with prayers for Their blessings from one end of India to the other — Their Name alone has wrought a mighty change for the better in your land. It is not to Colonel Olcott or to me that you owe anything but, verily, to our venerated Masters. So long as I remained at Adyar, things went on smoothly enough because one or the other of the Masters was constantly present among us, and Their Spirit protected the fledgling Theosophical Society from real harm. In 1884, Colonel Olcott and I left for a visit to Europe, and while we were away the Padri-Coulomb “thunderbolt descended” upon us. When I returned in November, I was taken most dangerously ill. It was during that time, coinciding with Colonel Olcott’s absence in Burma, that the seeds of future strifes and disintegration of the Theosophical Society, were planted by the enemies of Truth on fertile ground. What with the Patterson-Coulomb-Hodgson conspiracy, and the faintheartedness of the chief Theosophists, that the Society did not then and there collapse should be sufficient proof of how it was protected. No Adept of the Right Path is allowed to interfere with the just workings of Karma. Not even the greatest of Yogis can divert the progress of Karma or arrest the natural results of actions for more than a short period, and even in that case, the same results will only reassert themselves later with tenfold force, for such is the Unerring Law of Karma and the Nidanas. We all have to win our Moksha or Nirvana by merit, and not because a Guru or a Deva may absolve our shortcomings. Salvation by self-forgetfulness and personal merit are the cornerstones of Lord Buddha’s teachings. What merit can there be in an Immaculate Deva, unconnected with matter, who can claim no virtue for her purity? Yet the eternal bliss of Moksha is looming forth for the man who becomes God, by his self-induced and self-devised exertions. It is the mission of the Moral Law of Karma to punish the immoral, and not the duty of a Master, who is the servant of the Law and not the arbiter. Those who embrace the Masters’ teachings and live the life of which They are the best exemplars, will never be abandoned by Them and will always find Their beneficent help whenever needed — whether overtly or covertly. Had the leaders at Adyar stood shoulder-to-shoulder, firm in their conviction of the presence and power of the Masters, Theosophy would have come out more triumphantly than ever, and none of their fears would have ever been realised, however cunning the legal traps set for me, and whatever mistakes and errors of judgment I, their humble representative, might have made. But the loyalty and courage of the Adyar authorities, and of the few Europeans who had put their trust in the Masters, were not equal to the trial when it came. In spite of my protests, I was hurried away from headquarters like a persona non grata. Ill as I was, almost dying in truth, yet I protested and would have battled for Theosophy in India to my last breath, had I found loyal support. But some feared legal entanglements, while my friends were alarmed at the doctors’ dire prognosis if I were to remain in India. So I was sent to Europe to regain my strength, with a promise of speedy return to Adyar. When the S.P.R. Report was published and this soap bubble burst over our heads, it unleashed a long series of false charges, every mail bringing something new. With the exception of Colonel Olcott, everyone else ostracised the Masters from their thoughts and Their spirit from Adyar. Every imaginable incongruity was connected with Their Holy Names, and I alone was held responsible for every disagreeable event that took place, and every “mistake” made. I implored Colonel Olcott to let me return, promising that I would live at Pondicherry, should my presence not be desirable at Adyar. To this I received the ridiculous answer that, should I return, I would be sent to the Andaman Islands as a Russian spy, which of course Olcott subsequently found out to be absolutely untrue. The readiness with which such a futile pretext for keeping me from Adyar was seized upon, shows in clear colours the ingratitude of those to whom I had given my life and health. Vilified, slandered, persecuted, and thrashed by the ingrate and heartless mob at Adyar, I voluntarily exiled myself to Europe in spite of my ardent desire not to abandon my beloved Aryavarta. Since my departure, not only the activity of the Movement in India gradually slackened, but those for whom I had the deepest affections, regarding them as a mother would her own sons, have turned against me. Acting under the Master’s orders, I began a new Movement in the West on the original lines, founded “Lucifer,” and the Lodge that bears my name. Eventually, I was invited to return to India, but the invitation came too late: neither would my doctor permit it, nor could I, if I were to remain true to my solemn pledge and vows, live in a place from which the Masters and Their Spirit have been cast out. I could never return to India in any other capacity than as Their faithful agent, for no advice of mine on occult lines was likely to be accepted because of my association with the Masters was doubted, and even totally denied by some. Half-measures are worse than none. People have either to believe entirely in me, or to honestly disbelieve. No one, no Theosophist, is compelled to believe, but it is worse than useless for people to ask me to help them, if they do not trust me. My only reason for accepting the exoteric direction of European affairs, was to save those who really had Theosophy at heart and worked for it and the Society, without being hampered by those who not only do not care for Theosophy, as laid out by the Masters, but who are diligently working against both, endeavouring to undermine and counteract the influence of the good work done, (a) by open denial of the existence of the Masters, (b) by declared and bitter hostility to myself, and (c) by joining forces with the most desperate enemies of our Society. The only claim which India could ever have upon me would be strong only in proportion to the activity of the Fellows for Theosophy and their loyalty to the Masters. You should not need my presence among you to convince you of the Truth of Theosophy, any more than your American brothers need it. A conviction that wanes when any particular personality is absent is no conviction at all. Further proof and teachings I shall give only to the Esoteric Section, for the following reason: its members are the only ones whom I have the right to expel for open disloyalty to their pledge (not to me, H.P.B., but to their Higher Self and the Mahatmic aspect of the Masters) — a privilege that I cannot exercise with the Fellows at large, yet one which is the only means of cutting off a diseased limb from the healthy body of the tree, and thus save it from decay. The rest of my life is devoted only to those who believe in the Masters, and are willing to work for Theosophy and for the T.S. on the lines devised by the founders of the T.S., upon which they were originally established.

Presents an overview and introduction to Gurdjieff's teaching. This title helps students to integrate theoretical knowledge with practical experience and gain a taste of what it means to work on oneself by following Ginsburg's six lessons.

This third edition of the classic text updates the information contained in the earlier editions, and includes new chapters on the origins of Hinduism; its history of relations with Buddhism, Christianity, and Islam; Hindu science; and Hindu measures of time. The chronology and the bibliography have been updated as well. A comprehensive survey of the Hindu tradition, the book deals with the history of Hinduism, the sacred writings of the Hindus, the Hindu worldview, and the specifics of the major branches of Hinduism—Vaisnavism, Saivism, and Saktism. It also focuses on the geographical ties of Hinduism with the land of India, the social order created by Hinduism, and the various systems of Hindu thought. Klaus K. Klostermaier describes the development of Hinduism in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries, including present-day political Hinduism and the efforts to turn Hinduism into a modern world religion. A unique feature of the book is its treatment of Hinduism in a topical fashion, rather than by chronological description of the development of Hinduism or by summary of the literature. The complexities of Hindu life and thought are thus made real to the reader, and Hindus will recognize it as their own tradition.

A Civil Society explores the struggle to initiate women as full participants in the masonic brotherhood that shared in the rise of France's civil society and its "civic morality" on behalf of women's rights. As a vital component of the third sector during France's modernization, freemasonry empowered women in complex social networks, contributing to a more liberal republic, a more open society, and a more engaged public culture. James Smith Allen shows that although women initially met with stiff resistance, their induction into the brotherhood was a significant step in the development of French civil society and its "civic morality," including the promotion of women's rights in the late nineteenth century. Pulling together the many gendered facets of masonry, Allen draws from periodicals, memoirs, and archival material to account for the rise of women within the masonic brotherhood in the context of rapid historical change. Thanks to women's social networks and their attendant social capital, masonry came to play a leading role in French civil society and the rethinking of gender relations in the public sphere.

Examines the first principles of the perennial philosophy or ancient wisdom tradition as expressed in the writings of its great exponents, Rene Guenon and Ananda K. Coomaraswamy, and offers a critique of the West from the standpoint of traditional principles.

A classic biography of one of the greatest spiritual teachers of our times In 1909, when he was just fourteen, Krishnamurti was proclaimed the world teacher in whom Maitreya, the Bodhisattva of compassion, would manifest. The proclamation was made by Annie Besant, then president of the Theosophical Society, a movement that combined Western occult philosophy with Buddhist and Hindu teachings. Besant trained Krishnamurti in his role as the chosen one but twenty years later he chose to disband the order he was head of and set out alone on his endless journey— As a contemporary of Krishnamurti and one of his closest associates. Pupul Jayakar offers an insider's view of the fascinating life and thought of an extraordinary individual.