Provides information on the "Missouri Environmental Law and Policy Review (MELPR)," published three times a year by the University of Missouri-Columbia School of Law. Notes that the "MELPR" focuses on environmental issues of interest to practitioners and policy makers in Missouri and the surrounding states. Lists current editorial board members. Offers access to the table of contents, editor's perspective, legislative summaries, and other highlights from selected issues. Links to other resources related to environmental law. Posts contact information via street address, telephone number, and e-mail.

Written by one of the nation's leading environmental law firms, this handbook provides concise, easy-to-understand explanations of your state compliance obligations. You'll get complete coverage of hazardous and solid waste disposal; air, water, and natural resources regulations; the state organizational structure; required permits and reports; the relationship between federal and state regulations; and more.

This article, forthcoming in the Journal of Environmental and Sustainability Law (formerly the Missouri Environmental Law and Policy Review), describes the evolution of U.S. environmental law through four generations and the characteristics of each generation. The fourth generation of environmental law (Fourth-Generation Environmental Law) aims to increase the resilience of linked social systems and ecosystems (social-ecological resilience). Given that systems can collapse under disturbances and shift to entirely new structures and functions, our environmental law institutions need improved adaptive capacity. There are five distinct and important alternatives to traditionally rigid, fragmented, certainty-seeking environmental law structures: adaptation, adaptive management, adaptive planning, adaptive governance, and adaptive law. Fortunately, adaptive environmental law and governance institutions are emerging, aimed at improving social-ecological resilience. Examples include developments in adaptive watershed governance institutions. These examples of fourth-generation environmental law suggest reasons to hope that environmental law can adapt for resilient communities and ecosystems. However, the article also explores the reasons why fourth-generation environmental law might disappoint us: its inherent limits and flaws. Nonetheless, hope itself is an adaptive and resilience-building strategy. The final section of the article discusses research on the psychology of hope and what it means for how we think about environmental law in the United States.