"Alexander, Bland, Beall, Berry, Blake, Bocock, Bond, Bonderant, Boone, Bowie, Bradford, Brooke, Broome, Boyd, Butler, Cabell-Horsley, Cadwalader, Carroll, Cavanagh, Chapman-Pearson, Clagett, Claiborne, Cole, Compton, Cullen, Denwood-Covington, Dering, Dorsey, Dunscomb, DuVal, Eltonhead, Elzey, Eversfield, Ewell, Fauntleroy, Fielder, Gantt, Gittings, Glover, Graves, Greenfield, Hall, Hay, Heighe, Hilleary, Holdsworth, Keene, King, Lee-Fearn, Lewis, Mackall, Moore-Weems, Nelson, Parker, Parrott, Perkins, Reynolds, Roberts, Semmes, Skinner, Smith (Highlands), Sprigg, Stoddert, Stoughton-Stoss, Tasker, Tryon, Waring, Weems, Wheeler, Wight (White), Williams, Winder, Wortham Worthington, Wood, Wright, Young-Smith (Halls-Creek), with 57 ancestral British pedigrees."

"Alexander, Bland, Beall, Berry, Blake, Bocock, Bond, Bonderant, Boone, Bowie, Bradford, Brooke, Broome, Boyd, Butler, Cabell-Horsley, Cadwalader, Carroll, Cavanagh, Chapman-Pearson, Clagett, Claiborne, Cole, Compton, Cresson, Cullen, Darnall-Hatton, Dering, Dorsett, Dorsey, Dunscomb, DuVal, Eltonhead, Elzey, Eversfield, Ewell, Fielder, Gantt, Gittings, Glover, Graves, Greenfield, Hall, Hay, Heighe, Hilleary, Holdsworth, Keene, King, Lee-Fearn, Lewis, Mackall, Moore-Weems, Nelson, Parker, Parrott, Perkins, Reynolds, Roberts, Semmes, Skinner, Smith (Highlands), Sprigg, Stoddert, Stoughton-Stoss, Tasker, Tryon, Waring, Weems, Wheeler, Wight (White), Williams, Winder, Wortham Worthington, Wood, Wright, Young-Smith (Halls-Creek), with 60 ancestral British pedigrees"--Page v.

"Alexander, Bland, Beall, Berry, Blake, Bocock, Bond, Bonderant, Boone, Bowie, Bradford, Brooke, Broome, Boyd, Butler, Cabell-Horsley, Cadwalader, Carroll, Cavanagh, Chapman-Pearson, Clagett, Claiborne, Cole, Compton, Cullen, Denwood-Covington, Dering, Dorsey, Dunscomb, DuVal, Eltonhead, Elzey, Eversfield, Ewell, Fauntleroy, Fielder, Gantt, Gittings, Glover, Graves, Greenfield, Hall, Hay, Heighe, Hilleary, Holdsworth, Keene, King, Lee-Fearn, Lewis, Mackall, Moore-Weems, Nelson, Parker, Parrott, Perkins, Reynolds, Roberts, Semmes, Skinner, Smith (Highlands), Sprigg, Stoddert, Stoughton-Stoss, Tasker, Tryon, Waring, Weems, Wheeler, Wight (White), Williams, Winder, Wortham Worthington, Wood, Wright, Young-Smith (Halls-Creek), with 57 ancestral British pedigrees."

William E. Nelson's first volume of the four-volume The Common Law of Colonial America (2008) established a new benchmark for study of colonial era legal history. Drawing from both a rich archival base and existing scholarship on the topic, the first volume demonstrated how the legal systems of Britain's thirteen North American colonies-each of which had unique economies, political structures, and religious institutions -slowly converged into a common law order that differed substantially from English common law. The first volume focused on how the legal systems of the Chesapeake colonies--Virginia and Maryland--contrasted with those of the New England colonies and traced these dissimilarities from the initial settlement of America until approximately 1660. In this new volume, Nelson brings the discussion forward, covering the years from 1660, which saw the Restoration of the British monarchy, to 1730. In particular, he analyzes the impact that an increasingly powerful British government had on the evolution of the common law in the New World. As the reach of the Crown extended, Britain imposed far more restrictions than before on the new colonies it had chartered in the Carolinas and the middle Atlantic region. The government's intent was to ensure that colonies' laws would align more tightly with British law. Nelson examines how the newfound coherence in British colonial policy led these new colonies to develop common law systems that corresponded more closely with one another, eliminating much of the variation that socio-economic differences had created in the earliest colonies. As this volume reveals, these trends in governance ultimately resulted in a tension between top-down pressures from Britain for a more uniform system of laws and bottom-up pressures from colonists to develop their own common law norms and preserve their own distinctive societies. Authoritative and deeply researched, the volumes in The Common Law of Colonial America will become the foundational resource for anyone interested the history of American law before the Revolution.

British Origins and Descendants Alexander, Bland, Beall, Berry, Blake, Bocock, Bond, Bonderant, Boone, Bowie, Bradford, BROOKE, Broome, Boyd, Butler, CABELL-HORSLEY, Cadwalader, Carroll, CAVANAGH, Chapman-Pearson, Clagett, Claiborne, COLE, Compton, Cullen, Denwood-Covington, DERING, Dorsey, Dunscomb, DuVal, Eltonhead, Elzey, Eversfield, Ewell, FIELDER, GANTT, Gittings, Glover, Graves, GREENFIELD, Hall, Hay, Heighe, Hilleary, Holdsworth, Keene, King, LEE-FEARN, Lewis, Mackall, Moore-Weems, Nelson, PARKER, Parrott, Perkins, Reynolds, Roberts, Semmes, Skinner, Smith (Highlands), Sprigg, STODDERT, Stoughton-Sloss, Tasker, Tryon, Waring, WEEMS, Wheeler, Wight (White), WILLIAMS, Winder, Wortham, Worthington, Wood, Wright, Young-Smith (Halls-Creek), with 57 Ancestral British Pedigrees.

Lorena Walsh offers an enlightening history of plantation management in the Chesapeake colonies of Virginia and Maryland, ranging from the founding of Jamestown to the close of the Seven Years' War and the end of the "Golden Age" of colonial Chesapeake agriculture. Walsh focuses on the operation of more than thirty individual plantations and on the decisions that large planters made about how they would run their farms. She argues that, in the mid-seventeenth century, Chesapeake planter elites deliberately chose to embrace slavery. Prior to 1763 the primary reason for large planters' debt was their purchase of capital assets--especially slaves--early in their careers. In the later stages of their careers, chronic indebtedness was rare. Walsh's narrative incorporates stories about the planters themselves, including family dynamics and relationships with enslaved workers. Accounts of personal and family fortunes among the privileged minority and the less well documented accounts of the suffering, resistance, and occasional minor victories of the enslaved workers add a personal dimension to more concrete measures of planter success or failure.

This book is a unique archaeological study of a British aristocratic family in eighteenth century Chesapeake.

Indian, European, and African women of seventeenth and eighteenth-century America were defenders of their native land, pioneers on the frontier, willing immigrants, and courageous slaves. They were also - as traditional scholarship tends to omit - as important as men in shaping American culture and history. This remarkable work is a gripping portrait that gives early-American women their proper place in history.

U.S. History is designed to meet the scope and sequence requirements of most introductory courses. The text provides a balanced approach to U.S. history, considering the people, events, and ideas that have shaped the United States from both the top down (politics, economics, diplomacy) and bottom up (eyewitness accounts, lived experience). U.S. History covers key forces that form the American experience, with particular attention to issues of race, class, and gender.

The earliest known Riley immigrants to the Chesapeake Bay Area were the three brothers - Garrett, Miles, and Thomas - arriving in Northern Virginia in 1635. Many of the oldest, surviving Riley Colonial Records and Land Grants of Maryland and Virginia, which are dated late 1600s and early 1700s, pertain to these immigrants and descendents. Many early Colonial Rileys used Christian names taken from the Bible, such as Samuel, Pharoah, Jeremiah, and Eliphaz. Moreover, early Rileys in Colonial America passed down many traditional given names used by O'Reillys (Anglicised as Reyley or Riley) in Ireland, such as Brian (Briain), Farrell (Ferghail), Hugh (Aodh), John (Seaán), and Miles (Maolmordha). And, in Colonial days, many Rileys of the Tidewater Frontier were related and moved in and out of the Colonies now known as Maryland and Virginia. In addition to three Rileys mentioned by name above, there were other Riley immigrants who came to Maryland and Virginia in the late 1600s and early 1700s. In this book, the writer discusses all known individuals of early generations of eight different Riley lines from the time of arrival of their immigrants to approximately 1850. By 1850, all of these Riley lines had multiplied so greatly that tracing their descendents to those living today is almost an impossible task. From 1850 to the present day, the writer discusses only his own branch of Rileys. Prior to this publication, such a comprehensive analysis of the early Riley families of Colonial Maryland and Virginia did not exist.