In the heart of India's rich legal history lies an extraordinary tale that changed the course of the nation's destiny. "A Landmark on the Indian Constitution" delves into the captivating story of a pivotal moment in the journey of India's democracy. This meticulously researched and engagingly written book explores the untold story of a landmark case that challenged the very foundations of the Indian Constitution. It takes readers on a fascinating journey through the corridors of power, the intricacies of legal arguments, and the passionate debates that echoed in the hallowed halls of justice. The book introduces us to the remarkable individuals who played pivotal roles in this constitutional saga – from the brilliant lawyers who argued the case to the visionary judges who rendered the historic verdict. It uncovers their personal struggles, their unwavering commitment to justice, and the sacrifices they made for the ideals they held dear. As readers embark on this intellectual and emotional journey, they will gain a deeper understanding of the Indian Constitution and the principles that underpin it. "A Landmark on the Indian Constitution" is not just a legal narrative; it's a story of courage, conviction, and the enduring spirit of democracy. This book is a must-read for anyone interested in the intricacies of Indian law, the evolution of democracy, and the indomitable human spirit that shapes the destiny of nations. Please note that this is a fictional description, and there may not be an actual book with this title or content. If you have any specific questions or would like to discuss a different topic, please feel free to ask.

This book provides a comprehensive empirical and theoretical analysis of the development of parties and party systems in Asia. The studies included advance a unique perspective in the literature by focusing on the concept of institutionalization and by analyzing parties in democratic settings as well as in authoritarian settings. The countries covered in the book range from East Asia to Southeast Asia to South Asia.

This book examines the problem of accountability in two African political systems, South Africa and Nigeria. Despite the principle of separation of powers and the doctrine of checks and balances among the institutions of governance, a burgeoning governance crisis stifles the potential of accountability and good governance. Legislative oversight in the two countries remains largely ineffective while citizens are left to face the consequences of the mismanagement of public resources by political elites. This book critically assesses how the legislative institutions in South Africa and Nigeria have been unable to harness the requisite constitutional powers to ensure accountability in government and explores the feasibility of their effectiveness. The book begins with a comparative analysis of the principles, tradition, and powers associated with legislative capability in South Africa and Nigeria. The chapters explore constitutional provisions and analyze the capacity of each legislature to function within its respective political environment. The book also examines the process and challenges associated with the various measures and mechanisms available for legislatures to ensure accountability in the two countries. Researchers, scholars and students of African politics will find this book useful in their understanding of the problems associated with the simmering governance crisis in South Africa and Nigeria.

This book assesses the larger influences that government termination by parliaments has on executive–legislative relations, claiming that the way in which the governments may be challenged or dismissed has far greater impact than previously understood. The core feature of a parliamentary system is not that governments tend to emerge from the legislatures in some way or another, but their political responsibility to this body. While in only some parliamentary systems the government needs formal support of parliament to take office, in all parliamentary systems no government can survive against the will of parliament. The academic literature related to the rules for how governments form is vast. Strikingly, scholars have paid far less time to unpack the core institution of parliamentary systems of government – the confidence relationship and the various no confidence procedures. The chapters explore the institutions by which parliaments hold governments accountable and how they balance elected parliaments and appointed governments in parliamentary systems. Contributions move beyond the standard focus on government formation and instead analyse government termination by parliament evaluating its consequences in a detailed and comprehensive manner. This book will be of interest to students and academics in the field of political science, governance and political theory. The chapters in this book were originally published in West European Politics.

This is the first book about the politics of party switching, or floor crossing, better known as "kalanterism" in Israeli politics. The Israeli parliament adopted legislation in 1991 that imposed penalties on parliamentary defectors. However, as the book documents, the effect of this legislation was extremely puzzling: the frequency of party switches has increased over time, and most switches have taken the form of party splits making Israeli legislative parties increasingly less cohesive and united. Building on evidence from parliamentary debates, committee records and contemporary journalistic accounts, author Csaba Nikolenyi shows that notwithstanding these unexpected consequences, the Israeli anti-defection legislation proved to be an important tool that governments could use to divide their opposition and shore up their often fragile parliamentary base of support.