Virgil by Philip Hardie revisits the topics of the first New Survey in the Classics published in 1967. This latest Survey explores how literary approaches have changed over the last thirty years, with individual chapters on Ecloques, Georgics and The Aenid, and style.

A stimulating investigation of some of Ovid's source-material.

The Reception of the Homeric Hymns is a collection of original essays exploring the reception of the Homeric Hymns in the literature and scholarship of the first century BC and beyond, particularly texts and authors of the late Hellenistic, Imperial, and Late Antique periods.

This volume of eighteen articles offers: Andrew R. Dyck, "The Fragments of Heliodorus Homericus"; Hayden Pelliccia, "Aeschylus, Eumenides 64-88 and the Ex Cathedra Language of Apollo"; G. Zuntz, "Aeschyli Prometheus"; Georgia Ann Machemer, "Medicine, Music, and Magic: The Healing Grace of Pindar's Fourth Nemean"; Carlo O. Pavese, "On Pindar fr. 169"; Deborah Steiner, "Pindar's 'Oggetti Parlanti'"; Heinz-G nther Nesselrath, "Parody and Later Greek Comedy"; Noel Robertson, "Athens' Festival of the New Wine"; Richard F. Thomas, "Two Problems in Theocritus (Id. 5.49, 22.66)"; Nita Krevans, "Ilia's Dream: Ennius, Virgil, and the Mythology of Seduction"; Benjamin Victor, "Remarks on the Andria of Terence"; Cynthia Damon, "Comm. Pet. 10"; Harold Gotoff, "Oratory: The Art of Illusion"; Henri J. W. Wijsman, "Ascanius, Gargara and Female Power in Georgics 3.269-270"*; Robert V. Albis, "Aeneid 2.57-59: The Ennian Background"; Mario Geymonat, "Callimachus at the End of Aeneas' Narration"; Alessandro Barchiesi, "Future Reflexive: Two Modes of Allusion and Ovid's Heroides"; and Monika Asztalos, "Boethius as a Transmitter of Greek Logic to the Latin West: The Categories." * By misunderstanding this article was published in an uncorrected form in HSCP, vol. 94 (1992). Any reference should be made to the article as published here.

A major new interpretation of Vergil's epic poem as a struggle between two incompatible versions of the Homeric hero This compelling book offers an entirely new way of understanding the Aeneid. Many scholars regard Vergil's poem as an attempt to combine Homer’s Iliad and Odyssey into a single epic. Joseph Farrell challenges this view, revealing how the Aeneid stages an epic contest to determine which kind of story it will tell—and what kind of hero Aeneas will be. Farrell shows how this contest is provoked by the transgressive goddess Juno, who challenges Vergil for the soul of his hero and poem. Her goal is to transform the poem into an Iliad of continuous Trojan persecution instead of an Odyssey of successful homecoming. Farrell discusses how ancient critics considered the flexible Odysseus the model of a good leader but censured the hero of the Iliad, the intransigent Achilles, as a bad one. He describes how the battle over which kind of leader Aeneas will prove to be continues throughout the poem, and explores how this struggle reflects in very different ways on the ethical legitimacy of Rome’s emperor, Caesar Augustus. By reframing the Aeneid in this way, Farrell demonstrates how the purpose of the poem is to confront the reader with an urgent decision between incompatible possibilities and provoke uncertainty about whether the poem is a celebration of Augustus or a melancholy reflection on the discontents of a troubled age.