The final title by William Comyns Beaumont, lost for almost sixty years, tells of the conspiracy to hide the true history of Britain and the world, perpetrated by Emperor Constantine and perpetuated ever since by the leaders of the Roman Church and those who support them. The author explains how not only the history but also the geography of the ancient world was altered for political and military gain. A global catastrophe and the context in which it occurred was covered up to protect the new Roman religion - an almost perfect control mechanism for humanity. Was it an act of gods, or men? Syria was moved from Britain to the Middle East and the ancient conflict is carried on there by proxy. Arguments over Palestine and Jerusalem, Damascus and Babylon need to be reviewed in the light of the apocalyptic truths revealed in this earth-changing book.

It is widely recognized by New Testament scholars that many of the sayings and actions attributed to Jesus in the gospels cannot be factually traced to him. To a considerable degree, these stories have been influenced, or even created, by the early church. Despite this gap between the "Jesus of history" and the "Christ of faith," the contemporary church continues to represent the traditional New Testament canon as a generally accurate record of the life of Jesus. The Great Deception exposes the dangers that accompany this disingenuous, unscientific approach and calls for a more rigorous treatment of the gospels. In a clear, straightforward narrative, Gerd Lüdemann establishes the criteria by which he believes it possible to distinguish inauthentic from authentic sayings and actions of Jesus, and then shows which quotes and deeds can be regarded as factual. His radical conclusion is that the Jesus of history, who emerges after the falsehoods attributed to him are pared away, cannot support the traditional Christian faith. Lüdemann's historical analysis reveals, nonetheless, a Jesus who remains a deeply sympathetic personality and one of the great religious figures of the world. But it also shows that Christian leaders who ignore the results of sound scholarship are selling the faithful a "great deception."

In the aftermath of the cataclysmic battle that shook the very foundations of the world, the dust settles to reveal a landscape forever changed. The Antichrist lies vanquished, his reign of terror brought to an end by the unyielding resolve of those who dared to defy him. But victory comes at a cost, and the scars of war run deep in the hearts of the survivors. As they survey the wreckage left in the wake of the final showdown, they realize that the fight for freedom is far from over. For though the Antichrist may have been defeated, his dark legacy lives on in the hearts of men, a constant reminder of the fragility of peace in a world torn asunder by conflict. With the memory of their fallen comrades weighing heavy on their hearts, the survivors steel themselves for one final confrontation. Theirs is a journey fraught with peril and uncertainty, as they venture into the heart of darkness to confront the source of all their woes. But as they stand on the precipice of oblivion, they find strength in each other, drawing courage from the bonds of friendship forged in the crucible of war. United in purpose and resolve, they march forward to meet their destiny, knowing that the fate of humanity hangs in the balance. In the end, it is not the strength of arms or the might of armies that will determine the outcome of their struggle, but the indomitable spirit of hope that burns bright in the darkest of nights. For in the face of overwhelming odds, it is the courage to stand firm in the face of adversity that defines true heroism. As the final battle draws near, the fate of the world hangs in the balance. Will the forces of light prevail against the encroaching darkness, or will they be consumed by the shadows that threaten to engulf them all? The answer lies in the hearts of the brave souls who dare to defy the darkness and stand as beacons of hope in a world consumed by despair.

A proud emperor spends his kingdom’s wealth on beautiful palaces and rich clothes. Two swindlers convince the emperor they can weave a special cloth that is invisible to anyone unfit for office or is very foolish.

Since its publication in 2003, The Great Deception has taken on the role of the Eurosceptics' bible, with the third edition helping to fuel the debate during the 2016 EU Referendum. This fourth edition celebrates the moment when the UK broke away from the European Union, having been extensively re-edited to incorporate newly available archive material, and updated to include the tumultuous events of recent years. The Great Deception, therefore, tells for the first time the inside story of the most audacious political project of modern times, from its intellectual beginnings in the 1920s, when the blueprint for the European Union was first conceived by a British civil servant, right up to the point when the UK resumes its path at as an independent sovereign nation after 47 years of membership of the European project in its various guises. Drawing on a wealth of new evidence and existing sources, scarcely an episode of the story does not emerge in startling new light, from the real reasons why de Gaulle kept Britain out in the 1960s to the fall of Mrs Thatcher and the build-up to the referendum campaign which had its roots in the Maastricht Treaty. The book chillingly shows how Britain's politicians were consistently outplayed in a game the rules of which they never understood. It ends by evaluating the post referendum negotiations and asking whether this is the end of an episode or just a new beginning.

A Great Deception exposes the intermingling of politics and religion in Tibetan Buddhism worldwide, controversially revealing the Dalai Lama behind the public mask and the detrimental effect politics has on pure Buddhist doctrine.

As the European Union moves towards adopting the constitution which will mark its final emergence as a 'United States of Europe', The Great Deception shows how the most ambitious political project of our time has, for more than 50 years, been based on a colossal confidence trick - the systematic concealment from the peoples of Europe of what the aim of this project has always been since its inception in the late 1940s.

This book examines theoretical and practical issues concerning the relationship between international law, time and history. Problems relating to time and history are ever-present in the work of international lawyers, whether understood in terms of the role of historic practice in the doctrine of sources, the application of the principle of inter-temporal law in dispute settlement, or in gaining a coherent insight into the role that was played by international law in past events. But very little has been written about the various different ways in which international lawyers approach or understand the past, and it is with a view to exploring the dynamics of that engagement that this book has been compiled. In its broadest sense, it is possible to identify at least three different ways in which the relationship between international law and (its) history may be conceived. The first is that of a "history of international law" written in narrative form, and mapped out in terms of a teleology of origins, development, progress or renewal. The second is that of "history in international law" and of the role history plays in arguments about law itself (for example in the construction of customary international law). The third way of understanding that relationship is in terms of "international law in history": of understanding how international law has been engaged in the creation of a history that in some senses stands outside the history of international law itself. The essays in this collection make clear that each type of engagement with history and international law interweaves various different types of historical narrative, pointing to the typically multi-layered nature of internationallawyers' engagement with the past and its importance in shaping the present and future of international law.

Blasphemy of the Holy Spirit is an opposing Spirit the Bible calls the Spirit of the Antichrist. It is at heart the denial of The Shema (the greatest commandment). It is declaring that “Yahuah came to Earth as a man and died to save us”. We call this the Doctrine of Incarnation. The "carn" in "incarnation" refers to flesh or meat (of the human body). Thus, "incarnate" means "in the flesh". REINCARNATION is a word that means "to be born again (in the flesh)". Any concept of a Trinity or a Bi-Entity is blasphemy as Yahuah has declared He is ONE and He is Spirit and cannot and will not “come in the flesh”. The phrase “in the flesh” means... “natural/physical origin (not Spiritual), born of natural origin ONLY, mere human/natural birth only... APART FROM DIVINE INFLUENCE, prone to sin and opposed to Yahuah”. g4561 ‘sarki’ - Thayer: 2a) the body of a man 2b) used of natural or physical origin, generation or relationship 2b1) born of natural generation 4) the flesh, denotes mere human nature, the Earthly nature of man apart from divine influence, and therefore prone to sin and opposed to God” The True and False Spirits are defined by this understanding. The Spirit of Yahuah declares that Yahusha “came in the flesh” outside any divine influence, not Yahuah. The Spirit of the False Messiah (demi-god) is that Jesus is “God in the flesh” or that “God” came to Earth as a man and we killed him. Yahuah is Spirit NOT “sinful flesh”. To declare Yahuah “came in the flesh and died” is to deny what He declares about Himself. We are warned of this by Sha’ul in Romans 1 not to worship a man who died (Yahusha). Yahuah is Invisible Spirit not mortal man who died.