Reports of Cases Determined in the Appellate Courts of Illinois by Illinois Appellate Court. This book is a reproduction of the original book published in 1918 and may have some imperfections such as marks or hand-written notes.

This public domain book is an open and compatible implementation of the Uniform System of Citation.

This historic book may have numerous typos and missing text. Purchasers can download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. Not indexed. Not illustrated. 1912. Excerpt: ... The People v. Cantwell, 160 111. App. 652. The People of the State of Illinois, Defendant in Error, v. Robert E. Cantwell, Plaintiff in Error. Gen. No. 15,221. 1. Appeals And Errors--when bill of exceptions may be considered. A bill of exceptions in the Municipal Court if tendered within the statutory time may be considered on review although not approved until after such time. 2. Assault And Battery--ichen indictment sufficient. An indictment charging assault and battery may be sufficient without the use of the word "unlawful." Error to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Stephen A. Foster, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the October term, 1909. Affirmed. Opinion filed April 13, 1911. James T. Brady and George W. Plummeb, for plaintiff in error. John E. W. Wayman and John L. Hopkins, for defendant in error. Mb. Justice Brown delivered the opinion of the court. The plaintiff in error was found guilty by a jury in the Municipal Court of assault and battery and fined $75 and costs. The witnesses in the case are not in accord on the exact details of the affair, which culminated in a blow by the plaintiff in error that knocked down and broke the nose of a baseball umpire named Kerin, but there is nothing in the record throwing the least doubt on the fact that the blow was given in anger and wholly without legal justification. Beyond this there was evidence for the State quite sufficient to enable a jury to form a further belief that the act was without provocation or warning and inspired by resentment at a decision unpopular among the partisans of one baseball team in a match just played. Bird v. Thanhouser, 160 111. App. 653. The penalty was by no means unduly severe for the offense. Counsel for the People claim that the bill of exceptions in t...